So eve if the train was delayed , has any division got the right to delay it further? since 12561 , 12873 both has 130 kmph speed , so why it is not possible ki 12873 ko aage aage nikale aur uske peeche 12561 chale...
Secondly , 12561 ka halt GZB tyh jabki 12873 ka njhi toh 12561 ki vaajah se 12873 ko bhi outer pr rakha ....
aisa bhi toph ho sakta tha na ki 12873 ko aage nikaal deta coz uska toh stop GZB hai nhi...
Agar...
more... abhi 12561 ki jagah par 12873 hoti toh , 12561 ko aage nikaalta controller..
I agree ki 12873 delayed thi and yeh bhi toh hai ki usko slack bhi toh mila hai toh us slack mei cover krna chahiye tha delay .... and koi special traoin ya koi aur train bhi nahi thi us time .. mai isko subah se track kr rha hun ...
Aur SFs ki itni priority toh hoti hai na ki goods and all k paage chalaye.
I'm not offensive just points rakh rha apne
please wait...Translate to EnglishYo, even if the train was late, do any authorities have the right to delay it even more? Both 12561 and 12873 run at 130 kmph, so why not just let 12873 go ahead and have 12561 follow behind? Also, 12561 has a stop at GZB but 12873 doesn't, so because of 12561, even 12873 had to be held back on the outer track. Couldn't they have let 12873 go ahead since it doesn't stop at GZB? If 12873 was in 12561's place, the controller would have let 12561 go ahead. I get it that 12873 was already late and had some slack time, but they should've covered the delay within that slack... Plus, there weren't any special or other trains at that time. I've been tracking this since the morning... And ain't superfast trains supposed to have high priority over goods and all? Just putting my points out there, no offense intended.